Candy-Look Soap Is Still a Craft Quote (Do Not Borrow Food Docs)

The PDP is a pile of "watermelon slices" that are melt-and-pour soap. You asked for the gummy food-grade pack on the same tray. We will not. Food-contact documentation depends on material, use, and destination market. A craft soap fill does not inherit a chocolate quote.

RUUIPON since 2018. MOQ 20 per design. We will quote a craft compound for soap and a food-contact compound for edible candy as two jobs if you sell both. We do not say FDA-approved factory or FDA-certified products.

Looks Edible Is Not a Food-Contact Quote

Lye, fragrance, and colorant are not chocolate. A tray that will see CP soap should not be sold as a gummy tool. If you later pour pectin in it "just once," you mixed chemistry and docs. Start from the true fill.

What Docs Language We Will and Will Not Use

Ask	Answer
FDA-approved factory	No. We will not write it.
FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 on request for food-contact material	May apply when the SKU is eaten and the material is quoted that way
LFGB sections 30/31	May apply. We write sections, not a section sign.
Soap that looks like candy	Craft quote unless you also have an edible SKU

Food hub: food-grade silicone molds. Buyer spec: buyer spec. Soap product: soap molds.

When You Actually Need Two Tools

Edible SKU + soap SKU with different Shore, different wash, different customer lawsuits. Two designs, two MOQ 20 lots, or one honest craft tool and no food claim. We would rather lose a mixed RFQ than ship a tray with the wrong pack.

How to Ask Without Mixing Paths

Write "SOAP not edible" or "EDIBLE chocolate/gummy" on line one. Pour. Market. Qty. contact.

FAQ

Can one platinum sheet do both if I wash it?
We still quote the intended use. Docs follow the quoted material and market, not a wash story.

MOQ?
20 per design.

Same as hotel amenity soap article?
No. That URL is amenity turn speed. This one is docs vs candy-look.

Quote: quote.